Beyond the hyperbole: three macro takeaways from the 2024 U.S. elections

The 2024 U.S. elections delivered a trifecta for the Republican party: Not only did Donald Trump win the presidency, but Republicans also clinched crucial majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Among early market reactions to this red sweep, U.S. equities, the dollar, and bond yields have all climbed higher in the days since November 5.

For policy watchers, economic prognosticators, and investors alike, the question now is around what to take away from the 2024 election results. From where we sit, the answers have a lot to do with time horizons. 

1 In the short term, macrodynamics will prevail over the new administration’s emerging policies

President-Elect Trump won’t take office until January 20, 2025, roughly two months from today, which can seem like an eternity in the financial markets. More to the point, once the transfer of power does occur, the incoming administration will have to contend with some well-entrenched macroeconomic dynamics exerting their influence on the U.S. economy. We would expect the momentum of these dynamics to persist for some time before any policy changes even begin to have a meaningful impact on the economy. Consequently, in the short term (2–6 months out), we’ll remain focused on macroeconomic data over government actions as a driver of U.S. monetary policy and global markets.

Right now, we believe the combination of a cooling labor market and inflation trending back toward the U.S. Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) 2% target should allow the Fed to continue easing monetary policy until at least the middle of 2025. We also believe the lagged effects of higher interest rates since 2022 could eventually have a dampening effect on the economy, perhaps leading to a soft patch in the first half of next year. While the supporting data isn’t there yet, it’s a risk worth monitoring. Nonetheless, absent an alarming deterioration in the economic backdrop, a more accommodative interest-rate environment should continue to provide a tailwind for risk assets.

In the short term, we’ll remain focused on macroeconomic data over government actions as a driver of U.S. monetary policy and global markets.

2 In the medium term, Trump administration policies will likely accelerate global structural trends

With Republicans soon to regain control of both houses of Congress, the next Trump administration will likely face lower hurdles to turn some of its key campaign policy pledges into actual legislation. There is, however, a great deal of uncertainty around the timing and true impact of these proposed policies, making it difficult to accurately gauge their future effects on the markets. Broadly speaking, though, we do expect these policies to ultimately reinforce and accelerate two major global macroeconomic trends that were set in motion years ago: 

1) Deglobalization—President-Elect Trump has vowed to impose import tariffs on China and other global trading partners, which would accelerate the deglobalization trend that began some 15+ years ago. To be clear, deglobalization would probably have proceeded apace regardless of the 2024 election outcome, as illustrated by the fact that U.S. trade openness (based on the country’s imports as a share of its GDP) has been steadily declining across all U.S. administrations over the past couple of decades. Additional tariffs and trade restrictions would be consistent with the tendency to substitute globally sourced goods and services for domestically produced equivalents.

2)  Rising public debt—Across most countries and regions, levels of national government debt are higher now than they were before the COVID-19 pandemic, and we believe there’s little public appetite for reversing the upward trajectory of that debt. Notably, President-Elect Trump’s stated intention to extend the 2017 personal income-tax cuts passed during his first administration—and to consider lowering corporate income taxes even more—would further increase the already large U.S. federal budget deficit. Without offsetting revenue measures, the need for and supply of U.S. government debt would likely also rise, potentially putting upward pressure on global interest rates. 

3 Longer term, it’s too soon to definitively assess the economic effects

We believe that a likely one-two punch of looser fiscal policy and stiffer tariffs under President-Elect Trump 2.0 would, all else equal, lead to moderately higher global inflation in the period ahead. However, the overall, multi-year economic impact of any policies the new administration might enact remains to be seen because, without further details and/or an unimpeded runway to efficient execution, each of these policies could affect different sectors of the economy in distinct ways over time.

For instance, while President-Elect Trump’s campaign platform called for a drastic reduction in immigration into the United States, how implementable this would be in practice is a big unknown. Whether or not the economy would experience a net benefit from less immigration is also unclear. On one hand, a decreased labor force could eventually raise wages as the pool of labor available to businesses shrinks. Conversely, slower population growth could blunt aggregate demand for housing and related goods, as well as for consumer staples, which might ultimately prove disinflationary.

With all that in mind, initial outsize market moves in response to the U.S. elections are apt to fade. This would likely minimize portfolio effects for all but the most short-term, tactical investors. In that vein, we more or less agree with Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s "stay vigilant but don’t overreact" approach to how the Fed will be inclined to analyze any upcoming government policy changes: understand their potential economic implications, map out possible scenarios without factoring them into the base case, and be prepared to act judiciously as paths forward solidify. We suggest that most long-term investors do the same.

Initial outsize market moves in response to the U.S. elections are apt to fade. This would likely minimize portfolio effects for all but the most short-term, tactical investors.