Skip to main content

Asian credit’s next evolution: introducing the JACI Asia Pacific Index

On March 16, 2023, J.P. Morgan announced that it’ll be introducing the new JACI Asia Pacific Index into the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit family of indexes. We discuss the implications for investors.

On March 16, 2023, J.P. Morgan announced that it’ll be introducing the new JACI Asia Pacific Index within the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit family of indexes. This followed consultations with over 38 investment managers and asset owners domiciled in Asia, Europe, and the United States who collectively manage around US$115 billion of assets and over 90% of the assets benchmarked to the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit Index (JACI) series.  

The JACI Asia Pacific Index, to be launched in the second quarter of 2023, expands the coverage of the existing JACI to include debt from Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and other Pacific countries. To be clear, the JACI Asia Pacific Index is a new index within the JACI family. It won’t affect the existing flagship JACI, which will continue to focus exclusively on Asia debt (excluding the debt of Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and other Pacific countries).    

Main differences between the JACI Asia Pacific and JACI indexes

The JACI Asia Pacific Index is expected to provide coverage of US$1,561.8 billion in corporate, quasisovereign, and sovereign debt across 648 issuers in 21 markets. In comparison, the JACI covers US$1,089.9 billion in debt across 555 issuers in 17 markets.¹ The average credit rating for the JACI Asia Pacific Index is marginally higher at A3/A-/BBB+ than the Baa1/A-/BBB+ (Moody’s/S&P/Fitch) average rating for the JACI.² JACI Asia Pacific Index’s duration is marginally lower at 4.40 years compared with the JACI’s duration of 4.51 years.³

1 Regional exposure: One of the key differences is the inclusion of Japan (19.6%), Australia (9.7%), and New Zealand (0.9%) bonds in the JACI Asia Pacific Index. Accordingly, other Asia regional weights will be lower relative to their JACI weights, led by Mainland China (from 40.4% to 28.6%), Hong Kong (12.3% to 8.5%), and South Korea (10.7% to 7.3%).

2 Sector exposure: Financials within the JACI Asia Pacific Index will be higher at 37.9% compared with 26.8% in the JACI, given the dominance of high-quality banks and diversified financials among Japan and Australia issuers. Meanwhile, sovereigns and real estate issuers should see the largest corresponding declines based on estimates. 

3 Credit quality: Compared with the JACI, single-A-rated issues within the JACI Asia Pacific Index will be 7.3% higher at 39.0%, while exposure to BBB-rated issues will be 6.5% lower at 34.9%. Most newly added issuers from Australia, New Zealand, and Japan are single-A-rated issuers. The decrease in BBB-rated issuers is mainly due to reduced exposure to Asian sovereign issuers such as Indonesia and the Philippines.

JACI Asia Pacific Index vs. JACI—top 10 regional weights
Chart comparing the difference in market-weightage between the JACI Asia Pacific Index and the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit Index. The chart shows that Mainland China’s weightage in the Asia Pacific Index is significantly lower relative to the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit Index. The new index also includes Japan, Australia credit issues, which weren’t included in the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit Index.
Source: J.P. Morgan, as of February 28, 2023. JACI Asia Pacific index country weights are estimates from J.P. Morgan based on the new index.
JACI Asia Pacific Index vs. JACI—sector weights
Chart comparing the difference in sector-weightage between the JACI Asia Pacific Index and the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit Index. The chart shows that the financial sector is more prominent in the Asia Pacific Index relative to the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit Index; however, the real estate sector’s weightage in the JACI Asia Pacific Index is slightly lower relative to the J.P. Morgan Asia Credit Index.
Source: J.P. Morgan, as of February 28, 2023. JACI Asia Pacific index sector weights are estimates from J.P. Morgan based on the new index.

Implications for investors

Comparing the two indexes, the JACI has a high single-market exposure to Mainland China, while the JACI Asia Pacific Index sees this concentration diminished. Historically, China credit has at times exceeded 50% of the JACI weight due to the country’s dominance in new issuance trends and its importance as a growth engine for Asia. Therefore, a possible downside of the JACI for some investors is that they could face a high and potentially unwanted concentration in a single market versus the broader Asian credit universe. From this perspective, introducing the JACI Asia Pacific Index, which broadens exposure to include Japan and Asia-Pacific countries, helps to reduce the overall concentration in single markets.  

At the same time, the weighting for sovereign issues in the JACI Asia Pacific Index is lower at around 10.4% (versus 15.0% of the JACI), while the index’s exposure to corporate (including quasisovereign) issues is higher at just under 90.0% (versus 85.0%). As such, adopting the JACI Asia Pacific Index may help improve regional and sector diversification and reduce overall concentration risks.

Based on backtested results and analysis from the index provider, the JACI Asia Pacific Index has outperformed the JACI over the past six years, with cumulative returns of 8.96% versus 7.87% and lower volatility of 4.79% versus 5.34%, respectively. The JACI Asia Pacific index also achieved a Sharpe ratio of 0.31 versus 0.25 for the JACI.⁴

Concluding thoughts

As an Asian bond manager and asset owner, we’ve actively invested across the broader Asia-Pacific fixed-income universe, including Japanese and Australian issuers, for well over a decade. From our experience, we view such credits as being typically well supported by investors. The extension of the investment universe through the introduction of the JACI Asia Pacific Index may prove attractive for some investors looking for broader exposure to the Asia-Pacific region, with the potential for an improved risk/return profile as well as lower volatility. 

Given our extensive credit research footprint with fixed-income teams based on the ground across Asia, including Japan, we already have strong coverage and existing relationships with many of the new Japan, Australia, and New Zealand issuers that will form part of the JACI Asia Pacific Index. Accordingly, we believe we’re in a prime position to help customers navigate this exciting new phase of development in Asian credit. 

1 J.P. Morgan, March 16, 2023. 2 J.P. Morgan, as of February 28, 2023. 3 J.P. Morgan, as of February 2023. 4 J.P. Morgan, as of December 30, 2022. JACI Asia Pacific Index performance is backtested and hypothetical and is provided for informational purposes only to indicate historical performance had the index been calculated over the relevant time periods. The backtest is based on mapping the new JACI Asia Pacific Index constituents and running historical return/risk time series analysis.

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person.

All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment, or legal advice. Clients and prospects should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife Investment Management nor any affiliates or representatives (collectively Manulife Investment Management) are providing tax, investment, or legal advice.

This material is intended for the exclusive use of recipients in jurisdictions who are allowed to receive the material under their applicable law. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice. Our investment teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. These opinions may not necessarily reflect the views of Manulife Investment Management. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Manulife Investment Management shall not assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment approach, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation does not guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

A widespread health crisis such as a global pandemic could cause substantial market volatility, exchange-trading suspensions and closures, and affect portfolio performance. For example, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has resulted in significant disruptions to global business activity. The impact of a health crisis and other epidemics and pandemics that may arise in the future, could affect the global economy in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. A health crisis may exacerbate other preexisting political, social, and economic risks. Any such impact could adversely affect the portfolio’s performance, resulting in losses to your investment.

This material has not been reviewed by, is not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by Manulife Investment Management and its subsidiaries and affiliates, which includes the John Hancock Investment Management brand.

Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.

2820579

Murray Collis

Murray Collis, 

CIO, Asia (ex-Japan) Fixed Income

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio

Category

Tags