The Fed’s rate decision: not so surprising, but what’s the path forward?

The U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) kicked off its long-awaited monetary easing cycle with a bang yesterday, electing to reduce its policy rate by 50 basis points (bps). While the size of the rate cut wasn’t officially factored into many Fed forecasters’ base case scenarios, it wasn’t a real “surprise” decision either.

Over the past several days, market positioning had already been skewing toward the prospect of a 50bps cut coming out of the Fed’s September meeting, as various prominent (and mostly well informed) members of the financial press began to suggest that it was, in fact, likely to be a much closer call than the consensus 25bps cut that had been priced into markets following last week’s CPI inflation print.

The Fed’s latest Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) was largely unhelpful

Here are our takeaways from the Fed’s latest SEP, released yesterday:

  • The Fed’s dot-plot chart, which summarizes where the central bank expects its policy rate to be going forward, actually reads somewhat hawkish, at least relative to current market positioning. The Fed is telegraphing another 50bps of rate cuts between now and the end of 2024, implying a slower easing cycle in its final two meetings of the year. The range of potential outcomes provided by Fed forecasters reinforces this view, suggesting that less than 50bps would be the next most likely scenario. The expectation for 100bps of easing in 2025 remained unchanged, while two additional rate cuts (which would bring the federal funds rate to 3%) are now baked into 2026. While we agree with the destination, we expect the Fed’s journey there to be faster.
  • The rest of the forecasts within the range of potential outcomes almost look like they were calibrated to give the Fed maximum optionality and flexibility in its decision-making process: All were characterized by a more benign inflation profile, trend-like GDP growth, and a higher unemployment rate signaling some incremental, but by no means alarming, cooling of the labor market.

The Fed’s post-meeting statement and press conference were more telling

We’d instead turn our attention to the FOMC’s post-meeting statement and press conference. Since Fed Chair Powell’s Jackson Hole speech, there's been a clear move away from the Fed being purely focused on driving down inflation toward reemphasizing the other part of its dual mandate: full employment (i.e., a healthy job market). The FOMC essentially codified this shift in yesterday’s statement, adding the line: "The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2% objective.”

Since Fed Chair Powell’s Jackson Hole speech, there's been a clear move away from the Fed being purely focused on driving down inflation toward reemphasizing the other part of its dual mandate: full employment.

In our view, the implication of this addition is that, while the base case outlook is for gradual policy easing, there appears to be a low bar for the Fed to move more aggressively in cutting rates than what’s being telegraphed as of this writing.

The size and shape of this easing cycle will depend on the data

Downside surprises to the labor market and consumer data will be important to watch. We suspect that such scares may indeed occur in the months ahead. If the U.S. economy cools—and we maintain that it probably will—there may be future points at which some of the economic data surprises to the downside, potentially triggering a more aggressive policy response from the Fed. Consequently, our current expectation is for a further 75bps of easing, which would bring the federal funds rate to 4.25% by the end of 2024. Looking to 2025, we now anticipate that the policy rate will reach 3% before the end of the year; we’d previously called for the federal funds rate to hit our estimate of neutral a couple of quarters into 2026.

So, the Fed has finally begun easing—now what?


We see three important themes worth highlighting now that the Fed’s easing cycle is finally under way:

  1. Labor market data releases will likely be volatile events for financial markets. Investors will assess the shape of the easing to come based on key labor market releases such as nonfarm payrolls, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, and jobless claims. Gauges of consumer confidence like retail sales are another potential flashpoint to watch.
  2. As long as the U.S. economy holds up, easier monetary policy in the form of lower rates generally favors riskier investment assets, short-term volatility notwithstanding. While we do expect the economy to cool, we also acknowledge that the farther along the easing cycle path the Fed gets before seeing signs of economic weakness, the longer the landing strip for that elusive soft landing becomes.
  3. Clearly, this Fed meeting and its potential ripple effects aren’t just about the United States. Other global central banks, particularly those in the emerging markets, will likely now feel more comfortable pursuing their own easing cycles with the Fed having taken a definitive step in that direction as well. Recall that during the first half of 2024, a short-lived high-inflation, strong-growth environment effectively took Fed rate cuts off the table for the rest of the year, driving the U.S. dollar higher and forcing other central banks’ nascent easing cycles to pause. Bank Indonesia was a good example, having already cut its policy rate in anticipation of the Fed soon slashing its rate.

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person.

All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients and prospects should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife Investment Management, nor any of its affiliates or representatives (collectively “Manulife Investment Management”) is providing tax, investment or legal advice.

This material is intended for the exclusive use of recipients in jurisdictions who are allowed to receive the material under their applicable law. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice. Our investment teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. These opinions may not necessarily reflect the views of Manulife Investment Management. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Manulife Investment Management shall not assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment approach, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation doesn’t guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This material has not been reviewed by, and is not registered with, any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by Manulife Investment Management and its subsidiaries and affiliates, which includes the John Hancock Investment Management brand. © 2024 by Manulife Investment Management. Manulife Securities and/or Manulife Private Wealth are using with permission. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. Manulife Securities and/ or Manulife Private Wealth cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data.

Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.

3871416

Alex Grassino

Alex Grassino, 

Head of Global Macro Strategy, Multi-Asset Solutions

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio