No free lunch: annuity buy-ins or in-house pension management?

Annuity buy-ins are gaining popularity for defined benefit (DB) pension plans in Canada. But are they the best solution or simply a way for employers to gain some peace of mind? We explore a range of solutions that could help you meet your obligations to beneficiaries at a low cost and for every risk tolerance level.

For DB pension plans, an annuity buy-in consists of paying a single lump sum (in the form of assets and, if necessary, an additional cash amount) to an insurer in return for a guaranteed payment that covers the retirement benefits of policy members until their death.

Historically, the annuity buy-in market has been slow to gain popularity, since in general, the plan assets haven’t been sufficient to cover the required up-front payment to the insurer, forcing the plan sponsor to hand over a significant cash outlay (in addition to the pension plan’s assets). However, with recent interest-rate increases, pension plans are in healthier shape, and any additional cash outlays are generally lower than they were a few years ago.

DB pension plans are much healthier

Funded status of the average defined benefit pension plan in Canada

For the second quarter of 2023, the average funded status improved to 122.0%, from 120.8% in the first quarter. The current average funded status is significantly higher than what it was in December 2020 despite negative asset performance in 2022.
Source: PFaroe Moody’s Analytics 2023, as of June 30, 2023.

The main goal of an annuity buy-in is to transfer investment and longevity risks from the employer to the insurer. However, it’s important to keep in mind that in finance—like in other domains—there’s no such thing as a free lunch. In fact, despite the enviable position in which pension plans find themselves, we believe that, on average and over the long term, annuity buy-ins are still a more expensive option than the other available investment solutions. While in some cases an annuity buy-in may be preferable, we believe that for certain plan sponsors, it could be financially more advantageous to implement an investment solution that’s tailored to their own risk tolerance.

Range of solutions available

Investment risk is divided into two categories: compensated and uncompensated risks. Unlike with an annuity buy-in, no investment solution can eliminate these risks completely. However, by minimizing uncompensated risks and optimizing compensated risks, pension plans can transform investment risks into investment opportunities. 

Table listing compensated and uncompensated risks. Credit, liquidity, equities, and real assets are compensated risks, while interest rates, inflation, reinvestment, and currency are uncompensated risks.
For illustrative purposes only.

To achieve this, we first establish a cash flow matching portfolio. This portfolio is entirely made up of government and corporate bonds and constructed such that the impact of interest rates, inflation, and currency fluctuations is the same for assets and liabilities, leaving little to no effect on the plan’s financial health—in other words, immunizing the portfolios from those factors.

Then we introduce a growth portfolio. This portfolio is made up of all other types of assets (other than traditional bonds) and offers the possibility of a higher absolute return in the long term. For example, real assets (e.g., real estate, infrastructure, timberland, and farmland) are potential investment options in this situation as they can provide stable, predictable cash flow (like bonds) while offering the potential for capital growth.

Lastly, we combine the matching portfolio and the growth portfolio to benefit from a wide range of solutions that are suited for each pension plan. The optimal allocation between the matching and growth portfolios depends on the plan sponsor’s risk tolerance and the risk/reward trade-off.

While the total cost of a pension plan may not be fully known until the death of the last plan member (for a plan that’s closed to new members), we can still estimate that a solution fully invested in the matching portfolio will likely cost 10% less than an annuity buy-in given the investment risk. In addition, by introducing the growth portfolio and taking on a higher level of risk, the potential savings are significantly higher.

Reduction in the cost of a pension plan (%)

Using proportional matching

Allocation to the growth portfolio (%)

Average cost reduction relative to an annuity purchase

Probability of a higher cost than the annuity purchase rate

0%

10%

<1%

20%

20%

<1%

40%

27%

3%

60%

32%

7%

80%

36%

10%

Source: Manulife Investment Management, as of June 30, 2023. Proportional matching consists of matching only a portion of the anticipated cash flows to the matching portfolio, with the assumption that the growth portfolio will be able to provide an absolute return in addition to liabilities. Some refer to this strategy as liability-driven investing plus. 

How much are you willing to pay for peace of mind? More than 10%? How much risk are you willing to take on? These are a few of the questions you should ask yourself before choosing between an annuity buy-in and managing a plan.

Other considerations

The above cost-savings figures only take into account investment risk and represent the reality of DB pension plans. They don’t consider longevity risk (the longer beneficiaries live, the higher the cost of the plan) and aren’t applicable to indexed plans.

Indexation

An annuity buy-in is a contract by mutual agreement, so nearly any condition can be added to the contract, including inflation indexation; however, these conditions have a price, and you must be able to find a counterparty. In addition, the annuity buy-in market remains fairly small, and the more bespoke the contract becomes, the shallower the market gets, giving the insurer more pricing power. This means that for a plan seeking an annuity to cover its inflation-indexed benefits, particularly with inflation as high as it is right now, it would be harder to find an attractive price. 

On the other hand, active and disciplined management of a pension plan will enable it to adapt to all types of environments and conditions, such as indexing during high inflation. Each asset class has its own attributes, reacts differently to market events, and can be used to achieve different objectives. For example, infrastructure can be useful for an indexed benefit plan, as operators can set their own prices, which can grow as with inflation, making it easier to match the pension plan’s outgoing cash flows, which fluctuate with inflation.

Longevity risk

It’s important to note that longevity risk is generally marginal compared to investment risk. For example, if retirees in a given pension plan live 3% longer than first expected (which is a very large and unlikely longevity change), the cost of the pension plan would increase by about 6%—still well below the average savings against an annuity purchase as seen above. Moreover, after a significant increase in life expectancy in recent decades, which made longevity risk trickier, its growth has been fairly limited in recent years—the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic even caused a major setback in 2020. Actuarial tables are also increasingly accurate in estimating longevity, somewhat simplifying the task of managing longevity risk. 

Life expectancy growth has slowed significantly in recent years

Growth in life expectancy at birth in Canada

Chart showing the growth of life expectancy in Canada since 1964. the chart shows that after a significant increase in life expectancy in recent decades, its growth has been fairly limited in recent years, with COVID-19 causing a major setback in 2020.
Source: Manulife Investment Management, Bloomberg, with latest available data as of April 2023.

When managing a plan, longevity risk will always be a factor. However, we believe that you shouldn’t be deterred by longevity risk and that when all the costs, risks, and benefits are weighed, the best solution for most pension plans is found within the range of available solutions rather than in an annuity buy-in. 

Peace of mind for less

Ultimately, annuity buy-ins allow employers to purchase peace of mind by transferring investment and longevity risks; however, we don’t believe that they’re the best solution for all pension plans, even if pension plans are now healthier.

Another potential way to achieve peace of mind is by employing an outsourced chief investment officer, whether for a specific project or to fully manage the pension plan (e.g., advisory services, management and development of matching and growth portfolios, and administration). Although management fees apply, they are far lower than the cost of an annuity buy-in, and this option comes with a number of advantages, such as a vast platform of real assets and daily follow-up of investments and objectives.

In the end, although there’s no free lunch in the world of finance, it’s critical to get the best value for your—and your plan members’—money.

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.  These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a portfolio’s investments.

The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person. You should consider the suitability of any type of investment for your circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.

This material is intended for the exclusive use of recipients in jurisdictions who are allowed to receive the material under their applicable law. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice. Our investment teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. These opinions may not necessarily reflect the views of Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Neither Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment or legal advice.  This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment strategy, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation does not guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Manulife Investment Management

Manulife Investment Management is the global wealth and asset management segment of Manulife Financial Corporation. We draw on more than a century of financial stewardship to partner with clients across our institutional, retail, and retirement businesses globally. Our specialist approach to money management includes the highly differentiated strategies of our fixed-income, specialized equity, multi-asset solutions, and private markets teams—along with access to specialized, unaffiliated asset managers from around the world through our multimanager model.

This material has not been reviewed by, is not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by the following Manulife entities in their respective jurisdictions. Additional information about Manulife Investment Management may be found at manulifeim.com/institutional

Australia: Manulife Investment Management Timberland and Agriculture (Australasia) Pty Ltd, Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Brazil: Hancock Asset Management Brasil Ltda. Canada: Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management Distributors Inc., Manulife Investment Management (North America) Limited, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (Canada) Corp. Mainland China: Manulife Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited Company. European Economic Area Manulife Investment Management (Ireland) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland Hong Kong: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Indonesia: PT Manulife Aset Manajemen Indonesia. Japan: Manulife Investment Management (Japan) Limited. Malaysia: Manulife Investment Management (M) Berhad 200801033087 (834424-U) Philippines: Manulife Investment Management and Trust Corporation. Singapore: Manulife Investment Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 200709952G) South Korea: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Switzerland: Manulife IM (Switzerland) LLC. Taiwan: Manulife Investment Management (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. United Kingdom: Manulife Investment Management (Europe) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority United States: John Hancock Investment Management LLC, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (US) LLC and Manulife Investment Management Timberland and Agriculture Inc. Vietnam: Manulife Investment Fund Management (Vietnam) Company Limited.

Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.

3120476

Emilie Paquet, FSA

Emilie Paquet, FSA, 

Head of Strategic Initiatives and Innovation, Multi-Asset Solutions Team

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio