U.S. housing construction and timberland performance—a tale of two halves?

A robust recovery for U.S. housing and softwood markets in early 2022 has since dampened due to rising interest rates and persistent home price appreciation. Our quarterly report examines the underlying fundamentals for the asset class that should mitigate both near-term volatility and medium-term risks and reports on the key market indicators for Q2 2022.

The financial performance of U.S. timberland is heavily influenced by the trajectories of housing and lumber markets. Coming out of the pandemic-induced recession of 2020, timberland performance was bolstered in part by the robust recovery in U.S. housing and softwood lumber markets. The positive momentum for these markets extended into early 2022 but quickly dissipated as the U.S. Federal Reserve shifted its monetary policy and began raising interest rates to combat rampant inflation. As a result, outlooks for U.S. housing and lumber markets in 2022 are set to become a tale of two distinctly different halves. During the first half of 2022, residential construction markets were still being supported by strong demand fueled by the need for additional space to accommodate the marked increase in work-from-home arrangements, financially healthy consumers, and historically low mortgage rates. However, heading toward the middle of the year, rapidly rising interest rates and persistently robust home price appreciation negatively affected affordability and weighed heavily on homebuyer and home builder sentiment. By mid-2022, any remaining upward momentum in the U.S. housing market had faded and a correction in both housing and lumber markets was under way, clouding the near-term outlook for timberland revenues.

With the slowdown in residential construction activity, lumber prices have fallen 54% from the recent high of US$1,515 per thousand board feet (MBF) for Douglas fir #2 and better 2x4 reached in early 2022 to a low of US$690/MBF by midyear. And growing uncertainty around economic conditions has permeated the lumber market and is expected to subdue both demand and prices during the remainder of 2022 and into 2023. These developments have resulted in an increasingly bearish tone for the near-term outlook for forest product and timber markets, raising the question whether the current economic cycle could precipitate a downturn in housing and wood products markets comparable to the collapse that occurred during the global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008/2009.  However, evaluating the current state of U.S. housing markets in an historical context, digging deeper into the underlying housing market fundamentals and factoring in market developments such as the growing demand for carbon offsets, and a major expansion of lumber mill capacity under way in the U.S. South, leads us to the conclusion that the sky isn’t falling for timberland investments. These factors should help mitigate both the near-term volatility and medium-term risks to the outlook for timberland returns.

Housing affordability deteriorates

In April 2022, U.S housing starts reached a cyclical peak of 1.8 million units (seasonally adjusted annual rate), but a combination of rising interest rates and soaring home prices pushed housing affordability downward and took their toll on residential construction. Housing starts retreated strongly over the next three months, falling by a total of 359,000 units in May to July to 1.45 million units. During the first half of 2022, mortgage rates spiked higher, with the average rate for a conventional 30-year fixed-rate mortgage in the United States jumping 259 basis points (bps) from 3.11% at the end of 2021 to 5.70% at the end of June. The magnitude and speed at which mortgage rates increased added an estimated 36.0%, or US$489, to a potential average homeowner’s monthly mortgage payment (30-year fixed-rate mortgage with a 20.0% down payment) required for a US$400,000 home, at a time when budgets were already stretched by rapid home price appreciation.1 This potent combination of rising interest rates and home price appreciation continued at an elevated rate of 18.0% year over year in June, pushing the National Association of Realtors’ Housing Affordability Index down to 98.5 in June, down 31.0% from a year earlier and to the lowest level seen since at least 1990.

Housing affordability falls under pressure from rising interest rates and escalating home prices

National Association of Realtors, Monthly Housing Affordability Index

A line chart showing that housing affordability has dropped sharply during the quarter.
Source: Monthly Housing Affordability Index, National Association of Realtors, September 7, 2022. Reprinted with permission. It is not possible to invest in indices.

While affordability has deteriorated rapidly, individual homeowners aren’t as financially stretched as they were leading up to the GFC. The debt burden on individual households, as measured by the mortgage debt service payments as a share of disposable personal income, remains near the lowest level witnessed over the last 40 years, and 400bps lower than during the GFC. Many homeowners likely took advantage of historically low interest rates in 2020/2021 to refinance into fixed-rate mortgages at exceptionally low rates. Additionally, banks’ lending standards have remained much tighter compared with the period leading up to the GFC, with the Mortgage Bankers Association Mortgage Credit Availability Index hovering near the low levels experienced immediately following it, resulting in a much lower risk profile for the overall mortgage debt market. These factors should allow the market to avoid a replay of the GFC-related collapse in the housing market and provide the resilience to stage a speedier recovery.  

Households are well equipped financially to handle current mortgage payments

Mortgage debt service payments as a percent of disposable personal income, quarterly, seasonally adjusted

A line chart demonstrates that mortgage debt service payments as a percentage of disposal personal income has fallen steadily since approximately 2008.
Source: FRED Economic Data, as of September 8, 2022.

Demographics and supply constraints support the outlook

Although housing starts are likely to continue facing headwinds through the remainder of this year and into 2023, current demographics and exceptionally low housing inventory will remain supportive of the medium-to-longer term demand for U.S. housing and, by extension, for wood products and timber. These favorable demographics continue regardless of economic conditions, and the largest age cohort in the United States has now reached prime home-buying age.

Medium and longer-term residential construction will also be supported by the constrained supply of housing. More than a decade of underbuilding saw housing starts (production) falling well behind housing demand, creating a massive volume of pent-up demand for an estimated 4 million+ units by the end of the second quarter of 2022.2 The juxtaposition of demographics indicating increasing demand for housing with housing starts that are currently trending lower raises the potential for the volume of underbuilt housing stock to continue to expand if housing starts fall much further, for much longer. This dynamic should support housing starts in the current cycle at levels well above the lows experienced during the GFC and continue to be strongly supportive through the remainder of this decade.

In addition to the positive underlying demand fundamentals for the U.S. housing market, near-term demand for sawlogs for lumber production should be supported, in part, by the growing backlog of housing that is currently under construction but not yet completed. The number of homes under construction has grown 21% (year over year) to a near all-time high of 1.68 million units as of July 2022 as supply chain disruptions and lack of available labor have severely slowed the pace of construction. As these homes move toward completion, they’ll consume additional lumber and support log demand. In the very near term, this delayed wood consumption should help offset some of the negative effects on lumber and log demand that accompany falling housing starts.

New housing starts under construction hold near all-time high

U.S. new residential housing starts under construction, thousand units

Another line charts demonstrates that U.S. new residential housing starts have climbed sharply since approximately 2012.
Source: Monthly new residential construction, July 22, U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, August 16, 2022.

Recent setbacks and the ongoing challenges facing housing and lumber markets will weigh on the near-term outlook for timberland investments, but the combination of homeowners’ stronger financial position together with supportive underlying demographics and the exceptionally low available housing inventory (alongside a backlog of homes under construction) should help limit the scale and duration of the current reversal in U.S. housing and its impact on timber markets. And lumber producers are already betting on these strong fundamentals with plans to add nearly 4.5 billion board feet of new lumber capacity through 2024 in the U.S. South, which will generate additional demand for timber as the new volume starts up.3 Additional support and diversification for timberland investment performance will come from rapidly growing demand for timberland as a natural climate solution to sequester carbon and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. This, along with the positive underlying market fundamentals for housing, should help the timberland market to navigate the choppy waters ahead and arrive at what we believe to be clearer skies and calmer waters on the horizon.

 

Timberland market indicators through Q2 2022

Affordability weakens U.S. housing demand; lumber prices retreat

Quarterly U.S. housing starts (‘000s units) and U.S. softwood lumber composite price (USD per MBF)

A bar chart shows that lumber prices have dropped in response to softening demand as both affordability and second-quarter U.S. housing starts decline.
Source: Random Lengths, June 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, June 2022. MBF refers to 1,000 board feet. SAAR represents seasonally adjusted annual rate. It is not possible to invest in indices.

Second-quarter U.S. housing and lumber prices reflect softening demand as affordability declined alongside second-quarter U.S. housing starts, falling 4.0% from the first quarter and 3.8% below starts one year ago. Average softwood lumber prices in the second quarter corrected from a first-quarter spike, falling 35.0% and returning closer to prepandemic levels.    

Multifamily dwellings drive Australia housing approvals upward, lumber price gains stall

Australia softwood lumber AUD price, timber AUD price and dwelling unit approvals ('000 units)

A bar chart shows Australia dwelling approvals rising although softwood lumber prices stalled in the second quarter.
Source: Australia Bureau of Statistics, June 2022. KPMG, December 2021. Indufor Asia-Pacific (Australia) Pty Ltd., March 2022.

June-ending quarterly Australia dwelling approvals rose 4.5% over the previous quarter, driven by multifamily approvals (+7.7%), despite the consecutive monthly rate hikes from the Reserve Bank of Australia seen since May, and finished with cooling dwelling prices. Gains in softwood lumber prices stalled, and there is no new reportable data for softwood stumpage this quarter.

Widening profitability for Brazil BEK producers

Bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp (USD per tonne), quarterly BRL per USD

A line chart shows that the price for bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp reaching new highs, to USD1,520 per tonne.
Source: Hawkins Wright; Macrobond, as of August 2022.

Second-quarter bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp (BEK) prices (sold in USD) jumped 16% last quarter, reaching new highs at US$1,520 per tonne. Brazilian BEK producers benefit from their low-cost position, strengthened by the depreciation of the BRL to 0.191 per USD (5.23 BRL per USD).  

Softwood timber price gains slow in the U.S Pacific Northwest and South, reverse in New Zealand

Regional softwood sawtimber stumpage prices (USD per cubic meter)

A line chart compares softwood timber price gains by territory, slowing in the U.S. Pacific Northwest and South, and reversing in New Zealand.
Source: Fastmarkets RISI, TimberMart-South, New Zealand Ministry of Primary Industries, June 2022; KPMG, December 2021.

Prices gains for softwood stumpage in the second quarter slowed in the Pacific Northwest, with prices up just 1.5% from last quarter, following double-digit gains seen in the first quarter. Southern pine stumpage prices softened seasonally in the second quarter, down 5.5% while New Zealand radiata pine stumpage prices were affected by weaker demand in China and historically high shipping rates—driving stumpage prices down 24% during the second quarter, and 48.0% below prices seen one year ago.  

Timberland cash yields reach second-quarter 5-year high

U.S timberland annualized operating cash yields (% per year)

A line chart showing that 2022 timberland cash yields reached a 5-year high during the quarter.
Source: NCREIF, June 2022.

Cash yields from U.S. timberland operations reached 3.1% (annualized) in the second quarter, 6bps above second-quarter levels seen last year and 50bps above the prior five-year average yield. Strong stumpage prices and a steady demand for timber drove second-quarter performance.

Southern timberland values strengthen in private markets and correct in public markets

Quarterly U.S. South timberland values (USD per acre)

In this line chart, quarterly private U.S. South timberland values demonstrate strengthening prices in the second quarter, whereas publicly held timberland values fell in comparison to the second quarter of last year.
Source: Manulife Investment Management research as of August 2022.
Notes on quarterly U.S. South timberland values (USD per acre) chart source: NCREIF, June 2022, Manulife Investment Management, June 2022. Public equity values are derived from Manulife Investment Management’s Timberland Enterprise Value (TEV) per Southern Equivalent Acre (SEA) calculation for five timber-intensive publicly traded companies as compared to southern timberland values per acre calculated from the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF) database. TEV is a quarterly estimate based on total enterprise value (total market equity+ book value debt) less estimated value of processing facilities, other non-timber assets, and non-enterprise working capital. SEA uses regional NCREIF $/acre values to translate a company’s timberland holdings in various regions to the area of southern timberland that would have an equivalent market value. Manulife Investment Management is a participating member in the NCREIF Timberland Property Index. The index requires participating managers to report all eligible properties to the Index. Usage of this data is not an offer to buy or sell properties.

Values for privately held timberland in the U.S. South strengthened in the second quarter, averaging US$1,881 per acre, a 4.9% increase from the second quarter last year. Average values for southern timberland held within publicly traded ownerships as measured by Timberland Enterprise Value per Southern Equivalent Acre fell 7.6% from the second quarter last year. Large corrections in both forest product prices and the broader financial markets drove valuations downward.   

1 Change in mortgage payment calculated by comparing the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage payments on US$320,000 (US$400,000 home purchased with 20.00% down payment) at the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage of 3.11% at the end of 2021 to the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage of 5.70% at the end of June 2022. 2 Forest Economic Advisers, underlying housing demand statistics, May 2022. 3 Forisk Research, Forisk Quarterly Report, 2022.

A widespread health crisis such as a global pandemic could cause substantial market volatility, exchange-trading suspensions and closures, and affect portfolio performance. For example, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has resulted in significant disruptions to global business activity. The impact of a health crisis and other epidemics and pandemics that may arise in the future could affect the global economy in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. A health crisis may exacerbate other preexisting political, social, and economic risks. Any such impact could adversely affect the portfolio’s performance, resulting in losses to your investment.

Any performance information shown is the investment strategy composite gross of fees, including advisory and investment management fees and other expenses an investor would incur, but net of transaction costs, unless otherwise noted; deduction of such expenses would reduce returns. Net performance results reflect the application of the highest incremental rate of the standard investment advisory or management fee schedule to gross performance results, unless otherwise indicated. Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect. Actual fees may vary depending on, among other things, the applicable fee schedule, portfolio size and/or investment management agreement. For example, if $100,000 were invested and experienced a 10% annual return compounded monthly for 10 years, its ending value, without giving effect to the deduction of advisory or investment management fees, would be $270,704 with an annualized compounded return of 10.47%. If an advisory or investment management fee of 0.95% of the average market value of the account were deducted monthly for the 10-year period, the annualized compounded return would be 9.43% and the ending dollar value would be $246,355. Unless otherwise noted, returns greater than 1 year are annualized; calendar year returns for each one year period end in December. Discrepancies may occur due to rounding. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Performance information shown is generally for discretionary strategies/solutions and managed by a Manulife entity which is GIPS compliant and falls under the definition of a corresponding Manulife GIPS firm. Some investment strategies/solutions may not be included in a GIPS compliant firm under certain circumstances, such as SMA/UMA business in Canada.

Any characteristics, guidelines, constraints, or other information provided for this material was selected by the firm as representative of the investment strategy and is provided for illustrative purpose only, may change at any time, and may differ for a specific account. Each client account is individually managed; actual holdings will vary for each client and there is no guarantee that a particular client’s account will have the same characteristics as described herein. Any information about the holdings, asset allocation, or sector diversification is historical and is not an indication of future performance or any future portfolio composition, which will vary. Portfolio holdings are representative of the strategy, are subject to change at any time, are not a recommendation to buy or sell a security, and do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold or recommended for the portfolio. It should not be assumed that an investment in these securities was or will be profitable. Top ten holdings information combines share listings from the same issuer, and related depositary receipts, into a singular holding to accurately present aggregate economic interest in the referenced company.

No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment.

Diversification or asset allocation does not guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of a loss in any market. The indices referenced herein are broad-based securities market indices and used for illustrative purposes only. The indices cited are widely accepted benchmarks for investment performance within their relevant regions, sectors or asset classes, and represent non-managed investment portfolios.

If derivatives are employed, note that investing in derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments and, in a down market, could become harder to value or sell at a fair price.

Information about SFDR Unless otherwise noted, any references in this presentation to ESG or sustainability reflect the general approach of Manulife Investment Management to integrating sustainability risk considerations into our investment decision-making processes. Further details on Manulife Investment Management’s general approach to sustainability are available at www.manulifeim.com/institutional/global/en/sustainability.

The source for all information shown is Manulife Investment Management, unless otherwise noted.

Manulife Investment Management

Manulife Investment Management is the global wealth and asset management segment of Manulife Financial Corporation. We draw on more than a century of financial stewardship to partner with clients across our institutional, retail, and retirement businesses globally. Our specialist approach to money management includes the highly differentiated strategies of our fixed-income, specialized equity, multi-asset solutions, and private markets teams—along with access to specialized, unaffiliated asset managers from around the world through our multimanager model.

This material has not been reviewed by, is not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by the following Manulife entities in their respective jurisdictions. Additional information about Manulife Investment Management may be found at manulifeim.com/institutional

Australia: Manulife Investment Management Timberland and Agriculture (Australasia) Pty Ltd, Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Canada: Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management Distributors Inc., Manulife Investment Management (North America) Limited, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (Canada) Corp. China: Manulife Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited Company. European Economic Area Manulife Investment Management (Ireland) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland Hong Kong: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Indonesia: PT Manulife Aset Manajemen Indonesia. Japan: Manulife Investment Management (Japan) Limited. Malaysia: Manulife Investment Management (M) Berhad  200801033087 (834424-U) Philippines: Manulife Investment Management and Trust Corporation. Singapore: Manulife Investment Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 200709952G) South Korea: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Switzerland: Manulife IM (Switzerland) LLC. Taiwan: Manulife Investment Management (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. United Kingdom: Manulife Investment Management (Europe) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority United States: John Hancock Investment Management LLC, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (US) LLC and Manulife Investment Management Timberland and Agriculture Inc. Vietnam: Manulife Investment Fund Management (Vietnam) Company Limited.

Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.

2446375

David A. Fortin

David A. Fortin, 

Senior Director, Economic Research, Timberland and Agriculture

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Mary Ellen Aronow

Mary Ellen Aronow, 

Director of Forest Economics, Timberland

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio